| Title | Non-moving pools don't make best use of zones |
| Status | open |
| Priority | nice |
| Assigned user | Richard Brooksby |
| Organization | Ravenbrook |
| Description | Automatically managed but non-moving pool classes (AMS, AWL, LO) share zone allocation policy with moving pool classes (AMC, AMCZ). But this does not make sense. For example, mark-and-sweep pools classes like AMC may prefer to rotate the objects around a set of zones to avoid to having to reconsider objects that survived a recent collection. |
| Analysis | Have separate zone allocation policy for moving and non-moving pool classes. |
| How found | inspection |
| Evidence | None as yet |
| Created by | Gareth Rees |
| Created on | 2014-01-30 15:44:49 |
| Last modified by | Gareth Rees |
| Last modified on | 2014-01-30 15:44:49 |
| History | 2014-01-30 GDR Created. |