.. mode: -*- rst -*- Checking ======== :Tag: design.mps.check :Author: Gavin Matthews :Date: 1996-08-05 :Status: incomplete design :Revision: $Id: //info.ravenbrook.com/project/mps/master/design/check.txt#12 $ :Copyright: See section `Copyright and License`_. :Index terms: pair: checking; design Introduction ------------ _`.intro`: This documents the design of structure checking within the MPS. _`.readership`: MPS developers. Implementation -------------- _`.level`: There are three levels of checking: #. _`.level.sig`: The lowest level checks only that the structure has a valid ``Signature`` (see design.mps.sig_). .. _design.mps.sig: sig #. _`.level.shallow`: Shallow checking checks all local fields (including signature) and also checks the signatures of any parent or child structures. #. _`.level.deep`: Deep checking checks all local fields (including signatures), the signatures of any parent structures, and does full recursive checking on any child structures. _`.level.control`: Control over the levels of checking is via the definition of at most one of the macros ``TARGET_CHECK_SHALLOW`` (which if defined gives `.level.shallow`_), ``TARGET_CHECK_DEEP`` (which if defined gives `.level.deep`_). If neither macro is defined then `.level.sig`_ is used. These macros are not intended to be manipulated directly by developers, they should use the interface in impl.h.target. _`.order`: Because deep checking (`.level.deep`_) uses unchecked recursion, it is important that child relationships are acyclic (`.macro.down`_). _`.fun`: Every abstract data type which is a structure pointer should have a function ``Check`` which takes a pointer of type ```` and returns a ``Bool``. It should check all fields in order, using one of the macros in `.macro`_, or document why not. _`.fun.omit`: The only fields which should be omitted from a check function are those for which there is no meaningful check (for example, an unlimited unsigned integer with no relation to other fields). _`.fun.return`: Although the function returns a ``Bool``, if the assert handler returns (or there is no assert handler), then this is taken to mean "ignore and continue", and the check function hence returns ``TRUE``. _`.macro`: Checking is implemented by invoking four macros in impl.h.assert: ``CHECKS(type, val)`` _`.macro.sig`: ``CHECKS(type, val)`` checks the signature only, and should be called precisely on ``type`` and the received object pointer. ``CHECKL(cond)`` _`.macro.local`: ``CHECKL(cond)`` checks a local field (depending on level; see `.level`_), and should be called on each local field that is not an abstract data type structure pointer itself (apart from the signature), with an appropriate normally-true test condition. ``CHECKU(type, val)`` _`.macro.up`: ``CHECKU(type, val)`` checks a parent abstract data type structure pointer, performing at most signature checks (depending on level; see `.level`_). It should be called with the parent type and pointer. ``CHECKD(type, val)`` _`.macro.down`: ``CHECKD(type, val)`` checks a child abstract data type structure pointer, possibly invoking ``Check`` (depending on level; see `.level`_). It should be called with the child type and pointer. _`.full-type`: Use ``CHECKS()``, ``CHECKD()`` or ``CHECKU()`` on all types that satisfy these three requirements: _`.full-type.pointer`: The type is a pointer type. _`.full-type.check`: The type provides a function ``Bool TypeCheck(Type type)`` where ``Type`` is substituted for the name of the type (for example, ``PoolCheck()``). _`.full-type.sig`: The expression ``obj->sig`` is a valid value of type ``Sig`` whenever ``obj`` is a valid value of type ``Type``. _`.partial-type`: Where the type satisfies `.full-type.pointer`_ and `.full-type.check`_ but not `.full-type.sig`_ because the type lacks a signature in order to save space (this applies to small structures that are embedded many times in other structures, for example ``Ring``), use ``CHECKD_NOSIG()``. _`.hidden-type`: Where the type satisfies `.full-type.pointer`_ and `.full-type.check`_ but not `.full-type.sig`_ because the structure has a signature but the structure definition is not visible at point of checking (for example ``Root``), use ``CHECKD_NOSIG()`` and reference this tag. The structure could be considered for addition to ``mpmst.h``. Common assertions ----------------- _`.common`: Some assertions are commonly triggered by mistakes in the client program. These are listed in the section "Common assertions and their causes" in the MPS Reference, together with an explanation of their likely cause, and advice for fixing the problem. To assist with keeping the MPS Reference up to date, these assertions are marked with a cross-reference to this tag. When you update the assertion, you must also update the MPS Reference. Document History ---------------- - 1996-08-05 Gavin Matthews Incomplete design. - 2002-06-07 RB_ Converted from MMInfo database design document. - 2013-03-12 GDR_ Converted to reStructuredText. .. _RB: https://www.ravenbrook.com/consultants/rb/ .. _GDR: https://www.ravenbrook.com/consultants/gdr/ Copyright and License --------------------- Copyright © 2013–2020 `Ravenbrook Limited `_. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.