| Title | Retrospective fixing violates workflow |
| Status | closed |
| Priority | essential |
| Assigned user | Richard Brooksby |
| Organization | Ravenbrook |
| Description | In the UG we say that users can add fixes retrospectively (//info.ravenbrook.com/project/p4dti/master/manual/ug/index.html#12 section 4.2). However, this might change the status of a job, or attempt to change the status of a job the user doesn't own, and therefore violate workflow. |
| Analysis | We must study the use cases in more detail and work out what it's reasonable to do, and update the documentation. Actually, I think this is quite clear in the current documentation, " //info.ravenbrook.com/project/p4dti/master/manual/ug/index.html#17" section 4.2), so I'm closing this job. RB 2000-11-30 |
| How found | manual_test |
| Evidence | <http://www.ravenbrook.com/project/p4dti/doc/2000-10-31/mahi-alpha-test/> item 16 |
| Observed in | 0.3.2 |
| Created by | Richard Brooksby |
| Created on | 2000-11-22 11:51:39 |
| Last modified by | Gareth Rees |
| Last modified on | 2001-12-10 19:01:56 |
| History | 2000-11-22 RB Created from sources (see evidence) 2000-11-30 RB Closed (see analysis). |
| Change | Effect | Date | User | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4670 | closed | 2000-11-19 18:38:25 | Leah Bateman | Finished writing rough drafts of all but two use cases. Mildly rewrote the use cases that Richard wrote. Implemented a few style changes required by Perforce's template (mostly "→"). |